The Sheriff had a request last week from Falen, AKA Sarah (not be confused with the beta Sarah) for the following grammar issue:
THAT vs WHICH
Let's get ready to rrrrrruuuuuumble!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wait ... first I have to admit that I didn't know this was a grammar issue. I don't even think I have this problem. Maybe I do, and the beta, cripes ... I mean SARAH, never mentioned it? Hmph. That's doubtful. So, in hindsight, I actually don't have this problem. Whoa. I need to stop for a sec. A grammar problem I actually DON'T have? That's a first. I need a moment to process that ....
..........
.........
........
.......
......
.....
....
...
..
.
Okay, I'm good now (but I'm waaay proud of myself!). Let's get back on track. Since I didn't know about this rule, I had to do some research. And it was VERY easy to see why some people have a problem with this. The info I read had my heading running around in circles!
I'll try to break it down for you in my awesome, JD-way, and let's hope like heck I make sense!
First, you need to learn the difference between a restrictive clause and a nonrestrictive clause.
A restrictive clause is something has must be part of the sentence, otherwise it won't make sense, because it specifically restricts the noun.
A nonrestrictive clause is something that can be deleted from a sentence and the sentence would still make sense! (Clipping a little darling, anyone?)
Okay, with that in mind, use "THAT" with a restrictive clause, and "WHICH" with a nonrestrictive clause.
Here are some examples restrictive clauses with "that":
Romance books that have a happy ending sell better.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dogs that go to the groomer regularly smell better.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cars that have a slim exhaust pipe get better gas mileage. (not true, btw)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Now notice in the above sentence that if you removed the "that" part of the sentence (the part with the ^'s under it), it wouldn't make any sense. Right? Right!
Now, here are some nonrestrictive clause sentences with "which":
The rug, which I inherited from my grandmother, was made in Persia.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The cat, which clawed my eyes out last Sunday, has a terrible temper.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My book, which doesn't fit into any specific genre, will be hard to sell.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**AH-HA! See? In the sentences above, you could remove the nonrestrictive clause and STILL have a coherent sentence!
Because that was so easy, peasy, lemon squeezy, I won't confuse you anymore with other tid-bits of this rule. If you would like to learn even more (the other, albeit "important", rules) click-y, click-y on the links below.
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/that-vs-which/
http://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/That_Who_Which.pdf
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/which-versus-that.aspx
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/aue/xmasthat.html
THAT vs WHICH
Let's get ready to rrrrrruuuuuumble!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wait ... first I have to admit that I didn't know this was a grammar issue. I don't even think I have this problem. Maybe I do, and the beta, cripes ... I mean SARAH, never mentioned it? Hmph. That's doubtful. So, in hindsight, I actually don't have this problem. Whoa. I need to stop for a sec. A grammar problem I actually DON'T have? That's a first. I need a moment to process that ....
..........
.........
........
.......
......
.....
....
...
..
.
Okay, I'm good now (but I'm waaay proud of myself!). Let's get back on track. Since I didn't know about this rule, I had to do some research. And it was VERY easy to see why some people have a problem with this. The info I read had my heading running around in circles!
I'll try to break it down for you in my awesome, JD-way, and let's hope like heck I make sense!
First, you need to learn the difference between a restrictive clause and a nonrestrictive clause.
A restrictive clause is something has must be part of the sentence, otherwise it won't make sense, because it specifically restricts the noun.
A nonrestrictive clause is something that can be deleted from a sentence and the sentence would still make sense! (Clipping a little darling, anyone?)
Okay, with that in mind, use "THAT" with a restrictive clause, and "WHICH" with a nonrestrictive clause.
Here are some examples restrictive clauses with "that":
Romance books that have a happy ending sell better.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dogs that go to the groomer regularly smell better.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cars that have a slim exhaust pipe get better gas mileage. (not true, btw)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Now notice in the above sentence that if you removed the "that" part of the sentence (the part with the ^'s under it), it wouldn't make any sense. Right? Right!
Now, here are some nonrestrictive clause sentences with "which":
The rug, which I inherited from my grandmother, was made in Persia.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The cat, which clawed my eyes out last Sunday, has a terrible temper.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My book, which doesn't fit into any specific genre, will be hard to sell.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**AH-HA! See? In the sentences above, you could remove the nonrestrictive clause and STILL have a coherent sentence!
Because that was so easy, peasy, lemon squeezy, I won't confuse you anymore with other tid-bits of this rule. If you would like to learn even more (the other, albeit "important", rules) click-y, click-y on the links below.
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/that-vs-which/
http://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/That_Who_Which.pdf
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/which-versus-that.aspx
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/aue/xmasthat.html
Tell the world!!
~JD



























